Dear Liberal citizen,
I receive daily messages that condemn as “outdated”, “reactionary” or, in the most contemptible display of social stigma “fascist” everyone who thinks that tradition and the values related to tradition, are precious. The very same media and academia that you and your ilk have controlled for decades. Somehow that does not stop you from considering yourself “rebellious” and “against the system”, but that is a matter for another day.
You regard everyone that does not share your ideas of progress as simple obstacles that will end up in the scrapheaps of History.
Well, I do not have a very lofty view of whoever thinks History is a linear “progressive” process. It reveals not having read worth a damn, or having read only about the latest 200 years in the West. Like Kant, you mean to elaborate a universal system for Ethics and society without having ever left your village. No, going on holiday to New York City or on an Erasmus grant in Paris is not “leaving your village” but rather going to the village square; they are the centre from which the ideas that we colonial yokels end up adopting irradiate.
We know we are doomed.
We won’t probably see a restoration of order in our days. We have to suffer through Apocalypse, the Kali Yuga. Nevertheless, we know that your materialism, your Cultural Marxism will end up falling prey to its own contradictions (Marx was projecting here what he unconsciously knew or suspected of the Enlightenment mindset that he was an heir to). Our mission is not to go back to an idealised past, for time does never return. If you think that, you don’t understand jack shit. All we do is reject your concept of the future as the only one possible.
A reactionary, as Gómez Dávila said, is not the dreamer of abolished pasts, but the hunter of holy shadows upon the eternal hills.
You think the future must be a multi-coloured (tending to brownish) mass, although with the same ideology and way of life regardless of where you are.
It is interesting how you pretend to force the coexistence of LGBTQIA genderfluid Social Studies graduates with Wahhabi Islamists whose only learning is memorising the Koran and some basic electronics to make bombs that they will hide under their 4 wives’ burqas.
You think abortion, euthanasia and gay marriage are rights perfectly compatible with subsidising every child that pops out of a Moor who wants to throw homosexuals off towers. All of that from the comfortable vantage point of your “gender studies” without you even being able to change the oil in your car.
We want a different future.
One with neo-Gothic style spaceports. One in which every town and every village has an identity of its own, where every human being feels linked to those who came before and those that will come after. For we do not seek the past, as you seem to think because you chase the present (a sad attempt, for it is so fleeting!). We seek the eternal. And we know that before that happens we will have to see the decadence and collapse of the civilisation we call the West. We know this because many of us have a fact-based background: scientists, technicians, salesmen. We know that this civilization is in its last throes, with a crappy birthrate while Africa bursts at the seams we will experience a barbarian invasion again. We will possibly witness Rome burning in our lifetime. We know this because we have read History, not just rehashes of why the 3rd Reich lost.
It is not 1933 what will return, but 476.
Of course we did not discover that: Spengler or Céline predicted this in the 1920s and 30s. Yes, I mentioned two authors considered taboo by your official syllabi.
Right, that is another point: we know you but you do not know us.
We were raised in a system that you have modelled to your liking.
Yeah right. Now is the moment when you try to disprove me with the “patriarchy”, “structural racism” and other crimestop words to virtue-signal (while not solving a damn thing). We know how you think, because you have tried to make us think like you. But you don’t know how we think. Nor do you care, for, well, we are stale nazis and it’s not worth it because it is old and outdated. You forget that the sin of hubris is the gravest and worst. In another moment we will talk about how this system of yours, which you believe to be more modern and complete, is actually cruder — and that’s why we can predict you better than you can predict us.
What is our function then, according to ourselves?
That of a katechon, “the retainer”.
We are here to create the seeds of resistance that will become the spring of a rebirth. Inspired by the great saints of the High Middle Ages, people who kept the flame of knowledge and civilisation amidst the chaos: Saint Benedict of Nursia, Saint Isidore of Seville, Saint Bede the Venerable and so many others to whom we owe the legacy of Rome. Like the legionary in Pompeii surprised by the eruption on his watch who did not leave his post because he had not been relieved, we must hold on tight and keep everything that is fair and good, so that our heirs can enjoy it without suffering a new Dark Ages in which they would have to relearn too much. And doing our best so that the civilisation that they inherit from us is not one base around atrocious Islam, but on the Slavs, our still young brethren that Spengler called the Great White Hope. The Chinese will also experience a rebirth, and there is the possibility that the Hispanic Americas may give birth to another civilisation, itself a mestizo of Iberian and indigenous and thus partly our heir. As for Africa, the globalists have done their utmost to avoid the appearance of a civilisation based on the Tutsi, possibly the people best suited to command in all the continent. In short, we do not want a Caesar (it will appear regardless, but that is the last phase of decadence).
Not even the best Iron Surgeon can cure the patient now.
What has to be done is managing her heritage and raising her children.
If you think we are going to bow down to your plan, you are screwed.
You won’t escape your fate by believing in fairy tales, however “scientific” they may be. To the invader, you are just another White Christian, and if you say that you “are on his side” he will treat you like Quintus Servilius treated Audax, Dithalcus and Minuros. For him we are just “cochons à l’engrais”, resources to exploit and not human beings to respect. Joining the chorus praising the beautiful new suit of the Emperor will improve jack squat, and optimism is for cowards.
I hope that this has made you understand at least that there are people who think differently.
I do not mean to make you one of us, for that you need a certain temperament that you do not have, since you have become a progressive Liberal. At least admit in name of your so-called tolerance the nonsense of censoring the dissenter.